Suresh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.70461 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2017 Thana- KORMA DistrictSheikhpura ====================================================== Suresh Mahto Son of Rajo Mahto, resident of Village- Kusumbhadih, Police Station- Korma, District- Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 16-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 354, 307, 302, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and 8 of POCSO Act registered in connection with Korma P.S. Case No. 36 of 2017 (POCSO Case No. 18 of 2017).

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the accusations are general and omnibus in nature against all accused persons. There is case and counter case between the parties. After due investigation police has submitted final form in respect of the petitioner. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.70461 of 2018(2) dt.16-01-2019 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura in connection with Korma P.S. Case No. 36 of 2017 (POCSO Case No. 18 of 2017), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T