Dr. Surendra Prasad Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4261 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20109 of 2011 ===========================================================
1. Dr. Surendra Prasad Thakur, Son of Late Sukdeo Thakur, resident of Village + P.O.- Barhmotra, P.S.- Pandaul, District- Madhubani, retires employee as University Professor of R.N. College Pandaul, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Sri Amarjeet Sinha, the Principal Secreatry, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
3. Dr. Samrendra Pratap Singh, Presently posted as Vice-Chancellor, L.N.M. University Darbhanga.
4. Sri Vijay Prasad Singh, Presently posted as Registrar, L.N.M. University, Darbhanga.
5. Sri Sushil Choudhary, the Finance Officer L.N.M. University, Darbhanga.
6. Dr. D.C. Choudhary, presently posted as Principal, R.N. College, Pandaul, District- Begusarai.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. SHASHI BHUSHAN SINGH For the Respondent/s : Mr. RAJENDRA KR. JHA =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-11-2017 The only direction issued on 09.01.2012 in C.W.J.C. No. 20109 of 2011 was to settle the claim of the petitioner and there was no positive mandamus to settle the claim in a particular manner. From the counter affidavit filed by the University on 31.07.2017, it is seen that arrears of salary between 01.01.2006 to 31.07.2008 have been calculated to Rs. 5,58,620/- and paid to the petitioner and thereafter vide Government Resolution No. 1671 dated 16.08.2012 further pension and other benefits granted to the petitioner
Patna High Court MJC No.4261 of 2013 dt.09-11-2017 in three installments amounting to a total of Rs. 9,30,046/-. From the counter affidavit filed by the respondents it is seen that the University and State Government have settle the claim as per their calculation. There being no positive mandamus to settle the claim in a particular manner, now no further indulgence in the matter is called for. In case the petitioner has any grievance still subsisting he shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate proceedings afresh in accordance with law.
This application is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) KKSINHA/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 16.11.2017 Transmission Date NA