← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51310/2024bail granted

Prakash Kumar @ Prakash Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-21Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51310 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-672 Year-2021 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Prakash Kumar @ Prakash Paswan, S/o Subodh Paswan, R/o VillagePrahaldchak, P.S- Fathuha, Distt.- Patna. 2.

Subodh Paswan, S/o Kamal Paswan, R/O Village- Prahaldchak, P.S.- Fathuha, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-08-2024 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Fathua P.S. Case No. 672 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Section 25(1-b) and 26 of the Arms Act.

3. The allegation is of recovery of 20 liters of country made liquor, as well as, one desi katta and two live cartidges from Nopulwa Alang.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51310 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 2/3 petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. They have no concern either with the seized liquor or trade of liquor in any manner. The alleged recovery has been made from an open place, which is easily accessible to anyone. The petitioner has been named in the present FIR on the basis of the information given by the Chowkidar of the village, who is in inimical terms with the petitioners. The petitioners have clean antecedent. On these grounds, petitioners seek to be released on bail.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioners, as well as, the recovery of the liquor and arms along with two live cartridges, has been made from an open place, which is easily accessible to anyone, I find that the petitioners, above named, have prima facie made out a case to be released on bail, the petitioners are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna City, District-Patna in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51310 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 3/3 connection with Fathua P.S. Case No. 672 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in Para-3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J.) Ashishsingh/- U T