Ranju Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11690 of 2016 ====================================================== Ranju Kumari W/o -Mahesh Chaudhary D/o - Ram Subhag Sharma R/o village- Rampur Bakhra, P.O.- Jarang Rampur, Block- Lalganj, DistrictVaishali, Presently Posted of Panchayat Teacher At Newly Created Primary School, Bakhra Bujurg Musahar Tola ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Joint Secretary Education Department, Government of Bihar,New Secretariat Bikas Bhawan, Patna 3.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate , Vaishali at Hajipur 5.

The District Educational Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur 6.

The District Programme Officer Establishment, Vaishali at Hajipur 7.

The Block Development Officer, cum Exceutive Officer 8.

The Block Education Officer, Lalganj, District Vaishali 9.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj , Purantant ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anish Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sc- Kinkar Kumar :

Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Upadhyaya (Ac to Sc9) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2024

1. Heard the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is fully covered by the judgment of this Court passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3360 of 2017 dated 26.09.2023 and C.W.J.C. No. 4506 of 2016 dated 04.10.2016.

3. Learned counsel for the State submits that it is correct that the fact of the case is identical to the fact of the aforesaid

Patna High Court CWJC No.11690 of 2016(8) dt.25-07-2024 2/2 two cases.

4. In view of the submission of the parties, the present writ application is disposed exactly in terms of the order dated 26.09.2023 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3360 of 2017. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 28.06.2016 is set aside.

5. The writ application is allowed with a direction that the petitioner shall be reinstated in the service with all consequential benefits like the petitioners of C.W.J.C. No. 4506 of 2016 and C.W.J.C. No. 3360 of 2017.

6. Accordingly, the present writ application is disposed with the aforesaid directions.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) HarshPandey/- U