Ravindra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57532 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-356 Year-2021 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== RAVINDRA KUMAR SON OF LATE MUNESHWAR PRASAD YADAV R/O VILLAGE- SIMARKOL, P.S.- RAJAULI, DISTRICT- NAWADA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Shukla, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 07-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 30(a)(d) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
As per the prosecution case, four accused persons including the petitioner herein on two motorcycles were caught and about 100 litres of liquor was recovered from their possession.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of his antecedent. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He is in custody since 14.7.2021 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57532 of 2021(2) dt.07-04-2022 2/2 The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State who submits that the petitioner has an antecedent under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, the petitioner being caught along with 100 litres of liquor along with other accused person together with the petitioner having antecedent under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 , the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in custody. (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U