Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48171/2025bail rejected

Md. Dilawar @ Dilawar Ansari @ Dilawar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-30Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48171 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2025 Thana- Sahayak Khajanchi District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Dilawar @ Dilawar Ansari @ Dilawar Son Of Md. Yakub @ Md. Yakub Khan @ Yaqub Khan, R/O Village - Kasai Mohalla Kabristan, P.S.- Sahayak Khajanchi, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Md Naushaduzzoha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025 Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioner and Ld. APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sahayak Khazanchi P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025 dated 09.04.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c)/21(b) of the NDPS Act.

3. As per allegation, two liter cough syrup containing codeine has been recovered from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that search and seizure was not conducted by the police as per law. He also submits that petitioner was not at home at the time of raid of the police.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48171 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 2/2

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the petition that petitioner has never moved before this Hon'ble Court for grant of Anticipatory Bail or Regular one.

6. It has also been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

7. However, Ld. APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail.

8. Considering the commercial quantity of the contraband seized from the house of the petitioner, I am not persuaded to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

9. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

(Jitendra Kumar, J.) ravishankar/- U T