← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/243/2012dismissed

Hardeo Pd. Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS

2023-10-13Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.243 of 2012 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3913 of 2010 ====================================================== Hardeo Pd. Singh S/O Late Janakdhari Singh R/O Village - Singariawan, P.S. Fatuha At Present Sahjahanpur , District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India through Sri R.K. Singh, Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, New Delhi 2.

Sri R.R.Jha, Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Freedom Fighter Section, Government Of India, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi-110003 3.

Sri H.C. Bhanot, Under Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Freedom Fighter Section, Government Of India, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi-110003 4.

H. Athel, Chief Controller Of Accounts, Pay and Accounts Officer (Pension and Miscellaneous) Ministry of Home Affairs, 10/2 Jam Nagar House, New Delhi 110011 5.

The State Of Bihar Through Sri Amir Subhani, The Home Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna 6.

Sri Rajiv Ranjan Sinha, The Joint Secretary, Department Of Home (Special) , Government Of Bihar, Patna 7.

Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, The District Magistrate, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Imteyaz Ahmad with Mr. Purushottam Kumar, Advocates For the State :

Mr. S. D. Yadav, AAG 9 with Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, AC to AAG 9 ======================================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-10-2023 Heard the parties.

2. At the outset, Mr. Purushottam Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits across the Board that the present contempt petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the sole petitioner has died during the pendency of the

Patna High Court MJC No.243 of 2012(5) dt.13-10-2023 2/2 present application.

3. Learned counsel for the State also submits that the order under contempt was put to challenge before the Division Bench and the same has also been set aside.

4. In view thereof, the present contempt petition stands dismissed, having become infructuous.

(Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- U