Manoj Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9422 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.
MANOJ KUMAR SINGH and ORS Son Of Late Haribansh Prasad Singh Resident Of Village Maldiha P.S. Barhara Kothi, District Purnia 2.
Ram Kumar Prasad Son Of Late Moti Mahto Resident Of Mohalla Ghujhari Tarai, P.S. Civil Line Gaya, District Gaya 3.
Yogendra Prasad Raj Son Of Late Gauri Prasad Rajak Resident Of Village Paharpur, P.S. Mahnar Road District Vaishali 4.
Sri Chandra Shekhar Prasad Son Of Late Sheo Narayan Prasad Resident Of Village Pamai, P.S. Parwalpur District Nalanda 5.
Baleshwar Prasad Son Of Late Satyadeo Singh Resident Of Village Mahendrapur P.S. Hathidah District Patna 6.
Prabhat Kiran Son Of Late Chandradeo Thakur Resident Of Mohalla Thakur Bhawan Charbhuj Thakur Marg, Cannipur P.S. Sadar Muzaffarpur District Muzaffarpur 7.
Bimlesh Kumar Son Of Late Brajnandan Prasad Resident Of Mohalla Jai Prakash Nagar Digha Ashiyana Road, P.S. Rajeev Nagar, District Patna 8.
Suresh Prasad Son Of Late Jagarnath Sah Resident Of Village Kail P.S. Charpokhari, District Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
The Principal Secretary, Department Of Science And Technology, Bihar, Patna 3.
The Principal Secretary Department Of Finance, Bihar, Patna 4.
The Director, Department Of Science and Technology, Patna, Bihar 5.
The Dy. Secretary, Department Of Science And Technology Bihar, Patna 6.
The Principal, Navin Govt. Polytechanic, Patna-12 7.
The Govt. Polytechnic Barauni, Begusarai ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar, AC to GP_4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-11-2023 Despite repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners today. On the last occasion on 17.09.2012 also
Patna High Court CWJC No.9422 of 2012(4) dt.28-11-2023 2/2 none had represented the petitioners when the matter was called.
2. However, learned counsel for the State is present.
3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for default for non-prosecution.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U