Patna High CourtCWJC/16592/2013disposed

Dhanjanjay Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-29Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.16592 of 2013 dt.29-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16592 of 2013 =========================================================== Dhanjanjay Jha Son of Madhusudan Jha Resident of Village - Phuldobhi Hathwara, P.S. Falka, District - Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Food & Civil Supply, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Katihar

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Katihar

5. The District Certificate Officer, Katihar

6. The S.D.O., Katihar

7. The Programme Officer, Falka, Katihar

8. The Block Development Officer, Falka, Katihar

9. The Block Supply Officer, Falka, Katihar, District - Katihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Parasmani, AC to GP 4 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 29-10-2018 As none appeared on behalf of the petitioner the matter was passed over for a few cases. However, on repeat call the petitioner was again not represented.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notice dated 16.08.2011 issued by the Certificate Officer in Certificate Case No. 02/2011-12 by which the petitioner has been directed to deposit an amount of Rs.6,33,323.60 towards undistributed food grains lifted under the SGRY Scheme.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16592 of 2013 dt.29-10-2018

3. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and states that the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action i n relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. Having regard to the stand of the respondents, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 02.11.2018 Transmission Date NA