Ravi Shankar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2238 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Ravi Shankar Son Of Dinanath Yadav Village- North Mandiri, Near Clinic of Dr. Vijay Shankar Dubey, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Baby Kumari wife of Ravi Shankar, D/o Kailash Prasad Resident of Village- Jahanpur, P.S.- Dhanarua, District- Patna., ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Vagisha Pragya Vacaknavi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kripa Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-03-2022 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

It is a case of cruelty against the informant (Opposite Party No.2) due to non-fulfilment of dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner is ready to pay Rs.45,000/- (forty five thousand) as lump-sum amount to the informant (Opposite Party No.2) and he also undertakes to pay an amount of Rs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2238 of 2021(9) dt.08-03-2022 2/2 5,000/- ( five thousand) per month to the informant (Opposite Party No.2) as interim maintenance in the first week of every month, which will commence from the month of April 2022 and the said amount will be deposited in the account of informant (Opposite Party No.2).

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant (Opposite Party No.2) has accepted the offer of the petitioner and undertakes to provide bank account details of the informant to the petitioner as early as possible.

Considering the aforestated facts, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Madhavi Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna in connection with Patna Mahila P.S. Case No. 89 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The aforesaid payments will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceedings. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T