Sushil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1877 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-546 Year-2020 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran ====================================================== Sushil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Son of Wakil Patel Resident of Mohalla- Noora Khap, Naya Tola, P.S.- Bettiah Mufassil, Distt- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amarendra Nath Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner seeks bail in Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case No. 546 of 2020, registered for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, one stolen motorcycle has been recovered from the house of the petitioner and petitioner was apprehended on the spot.
It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got clean antecedent and he is in custody since 22.08.2020. Chargesheet has already been submitted.
Considering the nature of accusation and period of custody, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1877 of 2021(2) dt.08-03-2021 2/2 furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case No. 546 of 2020, on the following conditions:
"(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court below and shall remain physically present, as directed by the court below, and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail."
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T