Naresh Yadav @ Ram Naresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56837 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2024 Thana- OBRA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Naresh Yadav @ Ram Naresh Yadav Son Of Kameshwar Yadav R/O- VillageObra Near Ani Tanki, P.S.- Obra, Distt.- Aurangabad (BIHAR) ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Bihar 2.

Lakhmani Devi Wife Of Nandu Vishkarma Resident Of Village And PostObra, P.S.- Obra, Distt.- Aurangabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms/Mrs. Malti Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 406, 420/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner on the pretext of providing help in getting right over her land and house, the petitioner took Rs.3.70 lacs from the informant. Accused petitioner also took work from son of the informant at the rate of Rs.30,000/- per month. When the petitioner failed to fulfill the assurance, informant demanded her amount but the same was not returned by the petitioner and he also threatened her.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to previous enmity and dirty village politics. As a matter of fact, son of the informant requested

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56837 of 2024(4) dt.11-02-2025 2/2 monetary help on credit from the petitioner and petitioner gave him 1.62 lacs on 14.3.20-21. When the said amount was demanded, in order to grab the same, informant implicated the petitioner in the present false and concocted case. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad in GR No. 640/2024, Obra Police Station Case No. 234 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T