Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48189/2023allowed

Ranveer Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2023-11-06Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48189 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-561 Year-2022 Thana- KHARHAGPUR District- Munger ====================================================== RANVEER SHARMA SON OF BALMIKI SHARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE -GAUNAI, PS -HAWAII KHRAGPUR, DISTRICT- MUNGER ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the Grand-daughter of the informant, due to non-fulfillment of further dowry demand.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. There is no any prior complaint regarding assaulting, harassment and torturing to the deceased against the petitioner and others. He submitted that during

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48189 of 2023(4) dt.06-11-2023 2/2 investigation, several independent witnesses have stated that the deceased herself committed suicide by hanging and this fact has come into light in vide paras- 10, 11 and 12 and the petitioner informed the grand-father (informant) of the deceased about the said incident. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 20.11.2022.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IVth, Munger in connection with Kharhagpur P.S. Case No. 561 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T