Satya Kumar @ Tantan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47758 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2024 Thana- DHANARUA District- Patna ====================================================== Satya Kumar @ Tantan S/o Dayanand Prasad @ Tanki Prasad R/o vill - Lalsha Chak, P.S.- Dhanarua, Dist.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation in the first information report is that while the informant was coming back with parcels, he was intercepted by three unknown persons, who chased him on a motorcycle and snatched 64 parcels and Rs.14,117/- and fled away.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown and the name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case on the confessional statement of co-accused Alok Kumar. It is further submitted that no recovery has been made from the conscious or
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47758 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 2/3 physical possession of the petitioner. No test identification parade has been conducted to establish the complicity of the petitioner. Moreover, chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted that one co-accused, Ankit Kumar has already been enlarged on regular bail by this Court vide order dated 26.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.33006 of 2025. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 24.02.2025.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition on the ground that the petitioner has three criminal antecedents. In response to the same, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is on bail in all the three cases.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No.291 of 2024, subject to the conditions that :
(i) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47758 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 3/3 (ii) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date til the charges are framed and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) Trivedi/- U T