Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56504/2021bail granted

Pintu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2021-10-06Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56504 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2020 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== PINTU YADAV Son of Kashi Yadav Resident of Village- Lalpur, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arjun Pd. Keshri For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prayer for bail of this petitioner was earlier rejected by this court vide order dated 02.02.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37471/2020. Through this petition the petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that petitioner is in custody since 24.05.2020 and he has remained in jail for more than one year and petitioner has got clean antecedent. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts of the case, the period of custody of the petitioner and the fact that this petitioner has got

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56504 of 2021(2) dt.06-10-2021 2/2 clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Jamui in connection with Khaira PS case No. 160/2020 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/ her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T