Ritu Raj Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41546 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -63 Year- 2017 Thana -ITARHI District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Ritu Raj Singh, son of Ramashray Singh, Resident of VillagePurushottampur, P.S.- Itarhi, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Itarhi P.S. Case No. 63 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-332, 353, 336, 290, 427 & other minor Sections 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section-27 of the Arms Act.

It is alleged in the written report that on account of accident, met by vehicle of fire brigade, several persons blocked the road, abused the police party and damaged the vehicle of fire brigade. The allegation against this petitioner is that he with another acused confined one of the employee of fire brigade. Besides this, there is no any allegation of specific overt act against this petitioner. In paragraph3 of the petition, it has been mentioned that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41546 of 2017 (2) dt.08-09-2017 2/2 allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Itarhi P.S. Case No. 63 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Buxar subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T