Smt. Meena @ Mina Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2534 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18792 of 2014 ====================================================== Smt. Meena @ Mina Devi wife of Mahesh Prasad Singh Resident of Kasturba Niwas, Vijay Nagar (Hanuman Nagar), New Bye Pass, P.S.- Patrakar Nagar, at present Sampatchak, District- Patna 800026. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Mr. Chaitnya Prasad son of- name not known to the petitioner, The Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
3.
Mr. Anupam Kumar Suman, son of- name not known to the petitioner, The Chief Executive Officer-cum- Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.
4.
Mr. Kumar Ravi, son of- name not known to the petitioner, the Collector, Patna.
5.
Mr. Umesh Kumar, son of- name not known to the petitioner, The Managing Director, Bihar Rajya Pool Nirman Nigam Limited, Patna. 6.
Mr. Binay Kumar Nag, son of- name not known to the petitioner, The Executive Engineer, Division- F, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 7.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, son of- name not known to the petitioner, The Commissioner, Department of Transport, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 8.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, son of- name not known to the petitioner, The District Transport Officer, Patna, District- Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha (AAG-7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-10-2024 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State is present.
2. A show-cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party nos. 3 and 6 as also on behalf of the opposite party nos. 5 and 6.
Patna High Court MJC No.2534 of 2019(3) dt.18-10-2024 2/2
3. This Court has been informed by learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 3, 5 and 6 that the order of this Court has been complied with.
4. In the aforesaid view of the matter, this application is being disposed of as having become infructuous. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Ranjeet/- U