Babita Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34318 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -32 Year- 2017 Thana -CHANDI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Babita Devi, Wife of Ranjeet Choudhary, Resident of Village- Dharampur (Said Barahi), Police Station- Chandi, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Chanchal Devi, wife of Dilip Choudhary.

3. Dilip Choudhary.

4. Dipu Choudhary.

Both sons of Late Karu Choudhary.

5. Chameli Devi, wife of Late Karu Choudhary. All Resident of Village- Dharampur, Police Station- Chandi, DistrictNalanda. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ======================================================

CORAM:

HONOURABLE MR.

JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-07-2017 Learned Sessions Judge, Nalanda Camp Court, Hilsa, has allowed anticipatory bail to opposite party Nos. 2 to 5 in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 32 of 2017,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34318 of 2017 (2) dt.27-07-2017 2/2 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 379, 504, 341 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, has submitted that while considering the case for grant of anticipatory bail to opposite party Nos. 2 to 5, the court below failed to consider the injury report, which was available on record.

Be that as it may, since no ground has been taken of any misuse of privilege of bail, so granted to opposite party Nos. 2 to 5, I am not inclined to entertain this application. This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Praveen-II/- U T