← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48276/2025bail rejected

Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48276 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2022 Thana- AGIAON District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Vishal Kumar S/o Umesh Singh R/o Village- Dularpur, P.S.- Agiaon (Garhani), District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate :

Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-11-2025 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act .

3. As per FIR, petitioner along with accused persons came to the house of the informant and started demanding their dues amount from the grandson of the informant. It is alleged that petitioner and others indiscriminately fired upon the grandson of the informant and fled away. Subsequently, he died.

4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48276 of 2025(3) dt.21-11-2025 2/2 case. Informant is not an eye witness to the alleged occurrence. Petitioner is in custody since 27.01.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that specific allegation against this petitioner that he fired upon the grandson of the informant due to which he died. Hence, he does not deserve regular bail.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, since petitioner is in custody since 27.01.2025, Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial, preferably, within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) AjayMishra/- U T