Patna High CourtC. REV./302/2013dismissed

Seasonal Ddt Employees Sangh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-11Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.302 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5650 of 2013 ====================================================== Seasonal Ddt Employees Sangh Through Its Secretary, Namely Rajendra Sahni Son Of Late Fauzdar Sahni Of Village Chandpura, P.S. Baligaon, District - Vaishali At Hajipur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna

3. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. Of Bihar

4. The Director In Chief, Health Services, Department Of Health, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

5. The Deputy Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

6. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur

7. The District Magistrate, Vaishali At Hajipur

8. The Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Medical Officer, Vaishali At Hajipur

9. The Additional Director Cum Chief Malaria Officer, Swastha Bhawan, Sultanganj, Patna

10. The District Malaria Officer, Vaishali At Hajipur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Senior Advocate Mr. A.K.Pandey, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Subodh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 11-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that liberty may be granted to the individual members of the Employees' Sangh to approach the Court for redressal of their grievances. On going through order dated 5.4.2013 (Annexure 1) against which review has been filed, this Court would observe

Patna High Court C. REV. No.302 of 2013 (6) dt.11-07-2018 2/2 that such opportunity has already been granted, as such no further order need be passed. Otherwise also, submission made by learned counsel for the review petitioner does not make out any ground for review of the order dated 5.4.2013. Review application is thus dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi.