Rajiv Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2944 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19884 of 2012 ====================================================== Rajiv Kumar Mishra s/o late Uma Kant Mishra resident of village- Chamtha Barkhut, P.O.- Barkhut, via- Bachhawara, P.S.- Bachhawara, DistrictBegusarai, at present posted and working as Prakhand Teacher in Government Middle School, Chamtha Goptol, Anchal- Bachhawara, District- Begusarai.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Mr. Amir Subhani, The Principal and Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. Mr. G.S. Gangwar, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, patna
4. Mr. M. Ramchandra Tudu, The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.
5. Mr. Naushad Yusuf, The District Level Compassionate Appointment Committee through its Chairman, the District Magistrate, Begusarai.
6. Mr. Naushad Yusuf, The District Magistrate, Begusarai.
7. Mr. Kanchan Kapoor The Deputy Development Commissioner-cumChairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Begusarai.
8. Mr. Kumar Anil Sinha The Deputy Collector (Establishment), Begusarai.
9. Mr. Dinesh Safi, The District Education Officer, Begusarai.
10. Mr. Dhananjay UPadhyay The District Programme (Establishment), Begusarai.
11. Mr. Sanjeeta Kumari The Block Education Officer, Bachhawara, District- Begusarai.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC-11 Vikas Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 11-09-2018 In view of the order as contained in Annexure-'D' to the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party nos. 9 and 10, this contempt application cannot proceed.
Patna High Court MJC No.2944 of 2016 (4) dt.11-09-2018 It is disposed off, accordingly but with a liberty to the petitioner to agitate his grievance against the order as contained in Annexure-'D' in an appropriate jurisdiction.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Ved/- U