Manoj Chouhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57342 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-832 Year-2020 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Manoj Chouhan S/O Satto Chouhan R/O Village- Sisauni, Ward No. 13, P.S.- Kishanpur, District- Supaul 2.

Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar Yadav S/O Dipo Yadav @ Dip Narayan Yadav R/O Village- Khakhai, Ward No. 01, P.S.- Kishanpur, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant by means of rod on his head.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57342 of 2021(2) dt.29-06-2022 2/2 implicated in this case. From perusal of the prescription and C.T. Scan report it is crystal clear that the injured informant has not received serious injury. Learned cousnel for the petitioner further submits that the injury found on the informant is simple in nature. He submits that a compromise has been done between the parties which is annexed as Annexure-2 of this application. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 832 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T