Parwati Devi @ Arti Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46692 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2025 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.
Parwati Devi @ Arti Devi W/O Vijay Yadav R/O Village- Dhanauli, P.SBaheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. 2.
Rubha Devi W/O Lalu Yadav R/O Village- Dhanauli, P.S- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Saurav Anand, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2025 Heard Mr. Saurav Anand, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, learned APP for the State.
2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 31 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner no. 1, namely Parwati Devi ordered, and on her order, Lalu Yadav assaulted with farsa on the head of the informant, which was stopped on hand, and he fell down. After this, Yogendra Yadav came to rescue; he was also assaulted by Laxmi Yadav and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46692 of 2025(2) dt.01-08-2025 2/3 Pramod Yadav by means of an iron rod and farsa. Yogendra Yadav was being assaulted by Laxmi Yadav, Pramod and Vijay.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. He also submits that petitioner no. 2 has no allegation, petitioner no. 1 is only the order giver and those persons who have assaulted the deceased are not the petitioners before this Court. He further submits that from perusal of the postmortem report, it will transpire that the deceased has received only one injury. It has lastly been submitted that a statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.
5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners and submits that petitioner no. 1 is the order giver.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46692 of 2025(2) dt.01-08-2025 3/3 or surrender in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 31 of 2025, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VII, Darbhanga, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T