Balindra Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48288 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -98 Year- 2017 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================
1. Balindra Rai, son of Lal Babu Rai, resident of Village- Sabalpur, P.S. Sonepur, District Saran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.98 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 504, 506, 447, 427, 307, 380/34 Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that instant case is counter blast of Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.102 of 2017 instituted by Navin Kumar, son of co-accused Lal Babu Rai against the Informant and others. In the instant case, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner of assaulting the Informant.
Injury report of the injured has been annexed as Annexure-3 series, wherein, doctor has found all the injuries
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48288 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017 2/2 simple in nature.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.98 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T