Banarasi Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31404 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -264 Year- 2015 Thana -SAKRA District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Banarasi Devi W/o Suman Paswan, Resident of Village- Narsinghpur, Nautan, P.S.- Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nachiketa Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 21-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 264 of 2015 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner is a lady. There is no allegation of overt act against her. There is general and omnibus allegation against her. Other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 16.10.2015 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 48447 of 2015 by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31404 of 2017 (2) dt.21-07-2017 2/2 from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 264 of 2015 to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Muzaffarpur subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (i) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (ii) petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (iii) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) sushma/- U T