← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17234/2015disposed

Nirmal Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-09-05Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17234 of 2015 ====================================================== Nirmal Kumar Singh Son of Late Shishupal Singh, Resident of villageKotheyan, Police Station- Jalalpur, District- Saran Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue & Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Saran Chapra.

3.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sadar Chapra, Saran Chapra. 4.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Organization, Division -03, Saran Chapra.

5.

The Circle Officer, Jalalpur, Saran Chapra.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Rai, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sadanand Paswan, GP-29 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 05-09-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1.(I) For issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order dated 17-07-2014 (ANNEXURE - 5) passed by the learned Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sadar Chapra, Saran at Chapra (Respondent no 5) in Land Dispute Case No. 64 of 2013-14, filed by the petitioner against the Agent Sanjay Singh & Another Umesh Singh.

(II) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus and any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions and commanding the respondent/authorities to remove the encroachment from the public road as Plot No. 2930 and also

Patna High Court CWJC No.17234 of 2015(3) dt.05-09-2024 2/2 remove the illegal constructions made over Plot No. 2937 and Plot No. 2938, Khata No. 816, situated at Kotheyan, P.S. Jalalpur, District - Saran at Chapra."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U