← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2283/2012dismissed

Devanand Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-16Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2283 of 2012 ====================================================== Devanand Singh Son Of Sri Sitaram Singh Resident Of Village-Basuatta, P.S. Jamui, District Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Jamui

3. The District Superintendent Of Education, Jamui

4. The Block Development Officer, Jamui

5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Jamui

6. The Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Raj Khilar, Jamui Block, Jamui

7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Khilar, Jamui Block, Jamui

8. Kapuri Kumar Son Of Yogendra Yadav R/O Village Shivsono, P.S. Laxmipur, Distt. Jamui

9. Niraj Kumar S/O Srikant Singh R/O Village Sabipur, P.S. Laxmipur, Dist. Jamui ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kr. Pandey For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Apurva Kumar, AC to GA-4 For Pvt. Resp. 8 :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For Pvt. Resp. 9 :

Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 16-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. In view of the fact that the State Appellate Authority is now functional, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in order to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority.

3. Permission is granted.

4. In case the petitioner files an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today

Patna High Court CWJC No.2283 of 2012 dt.16-07-2018 2/2 along with a copy of this order, the State Appellate Authority is required to decide the appeal on its own merit after condoning the delay in filing the appeal in view of the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the writ petition for the same relief before this Court.

5. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 17.07.2018 Transmission Date