← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63703/2018bail granted

Md. Basir @ Bashir v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-31Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63703 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2017 Thana- SIKTI District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Basir @ Bashir son of Sobhan Ali, Resident of Village- Dhapri Ghermabari, Police Station- Palasi, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Special (POCSO) Case No. 06 of 2018 arising out of Sikty Police Station Case No. 143 of 2017 registered under Sections 363, 366A, 354A, 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the POCSO Act.

The accusation is that on 30.05.2017, accused Gulam Rasul and Md. Muslim along with two others entered into the house of the informant and kidnapped his minor daughter and the mobile of Gulam Rasul, fell down on the ground during course of kidnapping.

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63703 of 2018(3) dt.31-01-2019 2/2 petitioners submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. Name of the petitioner has been disclosed by co-accused Md. Sajjad before the police, which has got no evidentiary value in the eye of law. It is further submitted that after recovery of girl, her statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., in which she has denied about her kidnapping rather she disclosed that out of her sweet will, she married to Gulam Rasul, which is evident from Annexure-2 to the petition. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender by them within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Araria in connection with Special (POCSO) Case No. 06 of 2018 arising out of Sikty P.S. Case No. 143 of 2017, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) sushma/- U T