Sanjay Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.67142 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2018 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sanjay Rai S/o Fuldev Rai, Resident of Village- Mohamadpur, P.S.- Paroo, Dist- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 25-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307,379, 427, 504, 506 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Paroo P.S.Case No. 46/2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated with the accusation of having fired upon the informant. However, it is submitted that the petitioner has received simple injury by lathi.

4. Learned APP assisted by learned counsel for the informant appear and has been heard. The injury report in the case diary discloses the injury to be simple in nature caused by hard blunt substance.

5. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM 3rd (West), Muzaffarpur in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 46/2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2)

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67142 of 2018(4) dt.25-02-2019 2/2 Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T