Bachhi Manjhi @ Bachcho Manjhi @ Bacho Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.950 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-431 Year-2020 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== BACHHI MANJHI @ BACHCHO MANJHI @ BACHO MANJHI Son of Vijay Manjhi, Resident of Village- Indaut, P.S.- Hilsa, Distt- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lovekush Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the office within four weeks of normal functioning of the court, failing which the office is directed to place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case in brief is that the informant was sitting in his door all the accused persons named in the FIR, came there and assaulted to the informant by lathi, danda due to which he received head injury. It is further said that the petitioner also assaulted his father, his uncle and his brother and her mother by iron rod due which they have received head injuries

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.950 of 2021(2) dt.02-03-2021 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties. They are own Gotiyas and there was land dispute between the parties. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. He further submits that from perusal of the injury reports of the informant and his family members, the doctor has opined that all the injuries of are simple in nature. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.10.2020. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 431/2020 to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-1st, Hilsa (Nalanda). (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T