Manzoor Alam @ Manzar @ Manzoor @ Totowala v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47496 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2025 Thana- KODHOBARI District- Kishanganj ====================================================== 1.

Manzoor Alam @ Manzar @ Manzoor @ Totowala S/O Kafiluddin Resident of village- Bhagpunash Sontha, P.S.- Kochadhaman, District -Kishanganj. 2.

Rinki Khatoon@ Rinki Begam @ Rinki @ Rinki Rani W/O Manzoor Alam @ Manzar @ Manzoor @ Manzoor Totowala Resident of village- Bhagpunash Sontha, P.S.- Kochadhaman, District -Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amal Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Kodhobari P.S. Case no.28 of 2025 registered under Sections 140(3), 352, 351(2) and 142 of the B.N.S, 2023.

3. The allegation in the F.I.R is that the daughter of the informant had gone missing and subsequently, it was disclosed by way of telephonic call that co-accused Amir had abducted her daughter and kept at the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits at the outset that the victim is a major girl and she is in a love relationship with co-accused Amir. She left her house out of her own will without any threat or coercion. The F.I.R was lodged after a delay of five days and the victim was not recovered from the house of the petitioners. The reason of their false implication in this case only for the reason that the petitioners happen to be the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47496 of 2025(2) dt.13-08-2025 2/2 brother-in-law and sister of co-accused Amir. Further, medical examination of the victim girl also does not show any evidence of sexual act and her age is assessed between 18-20 years. The petitioners undertake to co-operate in case/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that thrust of allegation is against one Md. Amir whose anticipatory bail application filed before this Court has been withdrawn and has surrendered before learned Court below, it is directed that the petitioners above named, who have no criminal antecedent in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Kodhobari P.S. Case no.28 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T