Md. Tahir @ Tahir Khan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47563 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2026 Thana- PIRBAHOR District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Tahir @ Tahir Khan S/o Fazal Karim Resident of Fakirbara, Kutubuddin Lane Raja Baniya Gali, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP For the Informant : Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case no.349 of 2026 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 61(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that Ayan and Sahil started to abuse the informant's brother. The petitioner was also present there. It is further stated that Ayan and Sahil stabbed the informant's brother with a knife. The informant finally states that there was some dispute with respect to a girl between Aman and Ayan over which Ayan had threatened the informant's brother.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47563 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. From the contents of the FIR itself, it would transpire that the cause of occurrence is a dispute over a girl between Aman and Ayan and the petitioner has no concern with the same. Even the allegation of assault is mainly on Ayan and it was supported by co-accused Sahil. The petitioner is in custody since 23.4.2026 and has no criminal antecedent.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner is named in the FIR and there is direct allegation against him of having entered into a conspiracy to give effect to the occurrence.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR, the cause of occurrence as given therein, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as evident from the order of the learned trial Court, the petitioner being in custody since 23.4.2026 and not having any criminal antecedent, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case no.349 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47563 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3 like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna.
(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T