← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49460/2025disposed

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-11Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49460 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2025 Thana- KHAJEKALA District- Patna ====================================================== Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Son of Kishan Rai Resident of muhalla -Shish Mahal, Hamam par, PS -Khajekala District -Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Pradhan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act.

4. Allegation is of recovery of 4.200 litres of liquor from cowshed of Kishan Rai i.e. father of the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and cowshed is a place outside the house and thus is accessible to villagers at large. It is further submitted that no prudent person would use his own cowshed for committing an occurrence and thus would create

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49460 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 evidence against himself and hence would get implicated. It is next submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise, the police start implicating mechanically.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Khajekalan P.S. Case No. 19 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. It is made clear that thereafter the learned trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49460 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 petitioner has antecedent of only one case in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T