Sujit Kumar @ Sujit Prakash v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57125 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2021 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Sujit Kumar @ Sujit Prakash, Son Of Manoj Kumar Singh R/O VillageJigna, P.S.- Dinara, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504, 506, 337, 338 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that when he was returning home and reached near Bharat Singh's mill where accused Kishori Singh armed with gun, started abusing him and further, shot him on his hand and when Satyendra Singh came to rescue the informant, he was again shot by Kishori Singh. It is next alleged that when the informant reached home, he saw that his cousin brother Raju Singh had received gun shot injury on his neck and he disclosed that he was hit by Mantu Singh. It is next alleged that his another

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57125 of 2021(2) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 cousin Anish Kumar also disclosed that Mantu Singh also fired at him causing injury on his hand.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the specific allegation of firing is attributed to the accused persons and the petitioner is not alleged to be in the category of assailant in the sense that he is not alleged to have fired at best he was member of the mob.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Dinara P. S. Case No.65 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T