Md. Meraj And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2305 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -260 Year- 2014 Thana -MOTIPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Md. Meraj Son of Md.Harun
2. Jaushan Khatoon @ Jaubsan W/O Md.Meraj
3. Md.Harun S/O Late Safi Mohammad
4. Sabila Khatoon Wife of Md.Harun
5. Ajmeri Khatoon D/O Mohammad.Harun
6. Akhtari Khatoon D/O Mohammad Harun, All are Resident of villMansurpur,P.S-Motipur,Distt.-Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kalayan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 20-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the Petitioners are the in-laws of the deceased and claim to have been living separately, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in connection with Motipur P.S. case No.260 of 2014 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. (West),
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2305 of 2015 (2) dt.20-01-2015 2/2 Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T