Ravi Kumar Yadav @ Rabin Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45514 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Saharsa ====================================================== RAVI KUMAR YADAV @ RABIN KUMAR YADAV Son of Fahim Yadav, Resident of Village/ Mohalla- Kayasth Tola, Loco Shed Ward No. 28, P.S. and District- Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subesh Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Special (Excise) Case No. 168 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It has been alleged that 17.2 litres of liquor has been recovered from the hut of the petitioner, he has clean antecedent. Looking to the quantity of liquor and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45514 of 2019(2) dt.23-07-2019 2/2 Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Saharsa in connection with Special (Excise) Case No. 168 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr.PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail bond. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T