Nagendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64441 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2017 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== Nagendra Ram Son of Ram Naresh Ram, Resident of Village- Gahiri, Police Station- Nautan, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar No.-7 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 14-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 379 IPC registered in connection with Nautan (Jagdishpur) P.S. Case No. 215 of 2017.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the FIR is against unknown persons. The petitioner's name has surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused in Nautan P.S. Case No. 222 of 2017 under Section 413/414 IPC. The stolen motor cycle has been recovered from the possession of coaccused Aftab Alam @ Bablu Alam and Ajay Kumar. The petitioner claims clean antecedents, except the aforesaid Nautan P.S. Case No. 222 of 2017.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 6th ACJM, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Nautan (Jagdishpur) P.S. Case No. 215 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64441 of 2018(3) dt.14-02-2019 2/2 down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T