Surya Kumar Singh @ Surya Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49117 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -270 Year- 2017 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Surya Kumar Singh @ Surya Kumar, S/o Late Ramdayal Singh,
2. Gayatri Devi, W/o Surya Kumar Singh, Both R/o Village- Korhar, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Pronati Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 31-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Bihta P.S. Case No. 270 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 498(A) and 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that husband of the deceased is already in custody. The petitioners are parents-in-law of the deceased.
As per Fard-beyan, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49117 of 2017 (3) dt.31-10-2017 2/2 six weeks from today, in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 270 of 2015, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,
(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T