Shahina Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16966 of 2021 ====================================================== Shahina Khatoon wife of Mohammad Azam resident of Village and P.S. Semra Medroll, District- West Champaran, Bettiah. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah. 4.

The District Program Officer, I.C.D.S., West Champaran, Bettiah. 5.

The Child Development Programme Officer, Bagaha, District West Champaran, Bettiah.

6.

The Female Supervisor, I.C.D.S., Bagaha- 2, West Champaran, Bettiah. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raju Prasad, ADvocate For the State :

Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha ( Ga7 ) Ms. Sangha Mitra Ghosh, AC to GA-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 07-02-2024 1.

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "For issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing the memo no.- 1605/I.C.D.S., Bettiah, dated 28.11.2019 issued under the signature of respondent no.4, without considering the representation of the petitioner, submitted as per direction given by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 31.10.2018, whereby petitioner has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.16966 of 2021(2) dt.07-02-2024 2/2 terminated from selection of Aganbari Sevika (Services) and centre was tagged to nearest centre, merely on mechanical and cryptic manner, even without issuance of second show cause notice prior to issuance of impugned termination order (As contained in Annexure: 11)."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned civil court of competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U