Shashi Shekhar Prasad Singh @ Sashi Sheshar Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.317 of 2021 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7626 of 2020 ====================================================== Shashi Shekhar Prasad Singh @ Sashi Sheshar Prasad Singh, aged about 68 years, sex-male, Son of Ramsnehi Prasad Singh resident of Village- Dighra Rampur Sah, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri. Narmadeshwar Lal, the Principal Secretary, Bihar Industrial development Authority, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Sri Narmadeshwar Lal The Chairperson, Bihar Industrial area development Authority, Patna, Bihar.

3.

Dr. Chandra Shekhar Singh The District Magistrate cum Chair person, BIADA, Muzaffarpur.

4.

Sri R.S. Srivastav The Managing director, BIADA, Head quarter, Patna, BIADA.

5.

Sri Santosh Kr. Sinha The Development cum executive Director (in-charge), BIADA, Bela Industrial Area, Muzaffarpur.

6.

Sri Ajay Krishna Sinha, the Assistant Development Officer, BIADA, Bela Industrial Area development Authority, Muzaffarpur. 7.

Sri Narmadeshwar Lal The Chairperson, industrial development authority, Muzaffarpur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yugal Kishore. Advocate For the State :

Mr. AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR) 30-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present contempt application, the order under contempt has been complied with and, as such, the matter has become infructuous.

Patna High Court MJC No.317 of 2021(3) dt.30-01-2023 2/2

3. Learned counsel for the State reiterates and affirms the statements made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. In view of the above, the present contempt application stands disposed of.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) (Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- U