Mukhatar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49263 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2021 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Mukhatar Sahni, S/o Late Marathi Sahni R/o Village- Chakbaso, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the I.P.C. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the allegation is of recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49263 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2024 2/3 nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized motorcycle and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chaukidar. It is also submitted that it absolutely does not stand to reason that how Chaukidar identified the petitioner, when he not known to him.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise Court No.II, Muzaffarpur in connection with Saraiya P. S. Case No.176 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49263 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2024 3/3 before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that event, the present anticipatory bail application shall not be given effect to.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T