Patna High CourtC.R./85/2013dfd for non appearance

Md. Sufi v. Bibi Sazda And ORS.

2015-09-30Mr. Justice V. Nath1 pages

Patna High Court C.R. No.85 of 2013 (11) dt.30-09-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Revision No.85 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Md. Sufi S/O Late Moin Ahmad Resident Of Mohalla- Dilawarpur P.S.- Kotwali District- Munger .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Bibi Sazda W/O Late Hassan Ahmad Resident Of Mohalla- Dilawarpur P.S.- Kotwali District- Munger

2. Gulrez Hassan Son Of Hassan Ahmad Resident Of Mohalla- Dilawarpur P.S.- Kotwali District- Munger

3. Shabbir Hassan Son Of Late Hassan Ahmad Resident Of MohallaDilawarpur P.S.- Kotwali District- Munger

4. Dr. Md. Akram Rizvi Son Of Late Md. Gulam Quadir Resident Of Mohalla And P.S.- Nathnagar District- Bhagalpur

5. Dr. Shamim Akhtar Son Of Late Md. Gulam Quadir Resident Of Mohalla And P.S.- Nathnagar District- Bhagalpur

6. Dr. Md. Mukhtar Son Of Late Md. Gulam Quadir Resident Of Mohalla And P.S.- Nathnagar District- Bhagalpur

7. Md. Sikku @ Md. Piky @ Md. Binu Son Of Late Md. Gulam Quadir Resident Of Mohalla And P.S.- Nathnagar District- Bhagalpur

8. Bibi Noorani Daughter Of Late Md. Gulam Quadir Resident Of Mohalla And P.S.- Nathnagar District- Bhagalpur

9. Bibi Maharani Daughter Of Late Md. Gulam Quadir Resident Of Mohalla And P.S.- Nathnagar District- Bhagalpur

10. Bibi Mahta Daughter Of Late Md. Gulam Quadir Resident Of Mohalla And P.S.- Nathnagar District- Bhagalpur

11. Bibi Bahurani Daughter Of Late Md. Gulam Quadir Resident Of Mohalla And P.S.- Nathnagar District- Bhagalpur

12. Bibi Gulrani Daughter Of Late Md. Gulam Quadir Resident Of Mohalla And P.S.- Nathnagar District- Bhagalpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 30-09-2015 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner even after repeated calls.

The learned counsel for the opposite parties is present.

In view of the aforesaid fact, this revision application is dismissed as not pressed.

(V. Nath, J) Nitesh/- U