Ramchandra Manjhi And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.21336 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Ramchandra Manjhi, son of Late Budu Manjhi,
2. Manglu Tuddu, Son of Late Raghu Tuddu,
3. Rajendra Tuddu @ Rajesh Tuddu, son of Chanku Tuddu,
4. Sone Lal Tuddu, Son of Devan Marandi,
5. Dinesh Tuddu, son of Sonai Tuddu,
6. Manju Tuddu, Son of Ramchandra Tuddu,
7. Rajo Tuddu, Son of Munshi Tuddu,
8. Anant Tuddu, Son of Late Basant Lal Tuddu,
9. Maran Tuddu, Son of Late Bhaiya Kishku, All resident of Village-Terasi, Santhal Tola, P.S. Raniganj, DistrictAraria. .... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar,
2. Dinesh Prasad Yadav, son of Late Rajendra Yadav, Resident of VillageBegulaha, P.S. Raniganj, District - Araria. .... .... Opposite Parties.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr.
For the Opposite Party No. 2 : Mr. Samir Kumar, Advocate, For the State : Mr. Dilip Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-03-2016 None appears on behalf of the petitioners, while learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 Sri Samir Kumar, Advocate and Addl. P.P. appearing for the State are present. This application has been filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. against the order dated 30.01.2013 passed in Cr. Revision No. 311 of 2012 by the Court of Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge-IV, Araria, wherein order dated 06.06.2012 passed in case No. 222M of 2012 under Section 116(3) of Cr.P.C. directing the second party/petitioner in the proceeding to execute the bond to
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21336 of 2013 (4) dt.03-03-2016 2/2 maintain the peace in respect of disputed land till the pendency of the proceeding.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2 submits that in compliance of order dated 06.06.2012 passed in Case No. 222M of 2012 by the Court of SDM, Araria, which was affirmed by the Court of Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge-IV, Araria in Cr. Revision No. 311 of 2012 through the impugned order dated 30.01.2013 has already been complied by executing the bond by the members of the Second Party including the petitioners on 06.02.2013 in the Court of SDM, Araria.
Since, the order dated 06.06.2012 has already been complied with as such, I do not find any reason to entertain this application. Hence, this application is hereby dismissed. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T