← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51825/2024allowed

Ranjan Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-09Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51825 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-883 Year-2022 Thana- BRAHMPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

Ranjan Mishra son of Surendra Mishra VILLGE- DHEVANI, PSBRAHMPUR, DIST- BUXAR 2.

SHIVAM MISHRA SON OF JITENDRA MISHRA VILLGE- DHEVANI, PS- BRAHMPUR, DIST- BUXAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satyapal Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354A, 379, 504 of the IPC.

3. As per FIR, the informant alleged that the petitioners along with other co-accused persons armed with various weapons entered into her house and abused and assaulted her and her family members brutally .

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51825 of 2024(2) dt.09-08-2024 2/2 They have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is totally false and based on concocted facts. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. Both sides have filed cases against each other. He further submits that the similarly situated coaccused persons have been granted regular bail by different coordinate Bench of this Court. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they are in custody since 12.06.2024 and 18.06.2024, respectively.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since similarly situated co-accused have been granted regular bail, the above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Brahmpur P.S. Case no. 883 of 2022.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T