← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8284/2012disposed

Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar Sing v. Narendra Kumar Singh And ORS

2019-04-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8284 of 2012 ====================================================== ASHOK KUMAR @ ASHOK KUMAR SING Son of late Sukhdo Singh Resident of Village and Post Office- Mohanpur, Police Station- Bidupur, District Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

NARENDRA KUMAR SINGH and ORS Son of late Sukhdeo singh 2.

Upendra Nath Singh 3.

Satyendra Prasad Singh Both Sons of late Rajendra Singh All Resident of Village and Post Office- Mohanpur, Police Station- Bidupur, District Vaishali.

4.

Brajendra Prasad Singh, aged about 66 years Son of late Surendra Prasad Singh Resident of Village Narpati Nagar, P.S Sakari,District Madhubani. 5.

Pramila Devi Wife of Narendra Prasad Singh Resident of VillagePurantand, PO- Bhagwanpur, district Vaishali. 6.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, law Department, Bihar Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shravan Kumar, Sr. Advocate For the Respondent no.1 :

Mr.Rashid Izhar For respondent nos. 2 to 4 :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 08-04-2019 In the instant case, a joint compromise affidavit has been filed on behalf of petitioner and respondents on 24.3.2017. Mr. Shravan Kumar, learned Sr. counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Rashid Izhar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 as well as Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 to 4 submit that parties have voluntarily compromised and they have filed joint compromise affidavit.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8284 of 2012(18) dt.08-04-2019 2/2 They jointly prayed that in terms of compromise affidavit, the present dispute may be settled.

After hearing the counsels and on from perusal of compromise affidavit, the Court finds that parties have worked out solution of their dispute and they have framed three schedules for distribution of their properties. Considering the three schedules appended to the compromise affidavit, the present application is disposed of. The dispute between the parties are hereby settled in terms of three schedules appended to the joint compromise affidavit on 24.3.2017.

The schedules appended to the joint compromise affidavit shall form part of the decree of this case. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U