← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/25430/2013dismissed

Manoj Kumar v. The Bihar Police Building Construction Corporation And ORS

2018-12-05Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25430 of 2013 ==================================================== Manoj Kumar Son Of Late Shrinarayan Ambastha Resident Of Flat No.- 6LF/7-445, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Kankarbagh, PoliceStation- Agamkuan, In The Town And District Of Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar Police Building Construction Corporation, Through Its Additional Director General-Cum-Managing Director, B.M.P.-5 Campus, Kautilya Nagar, Patna- 800014

2. The Additional Director General-Cum-Managing Director, Bihar Police Building Construction Corporation B.M.P.-5 Campus, Kautilya Nagar, Patna- 800014

3. The Superintending Engineer, Circle No.- 1, Bihar Police Building Construction Corporation Kautilya Nagar, Patna- 800014

4. The Executive Engineer (Electrical), Bihar Police Building Construction Corporation Electrical Division, Patna

5. Shri Mahendra Prasad Singh Son Of Not Known The The Petitioner Presently Posted As Electrical Executive Engineer, Patna Division, Bihar Police Building Construction Corporation, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ==================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s:

Mr. Ranjit Kumar Singh,Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prasoon Sinha,Adv ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 05-12-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents not to proceed with the electrification work proposed to be made in model police station situated at Civil Line, Gaya as per the tender invitation notice no. 08/2013 vide item no. 28 which has already been allotted in favour of the proprietory firm of the petitioner in terms of short term tender notice no. 03/2010; and for connected reliefs.

Patna High Court CWJC No.25430 of 2013 dt.05-12-2018 2/2

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time and the writ petition need not be pressed.

3. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed. (Vikash Jain, J) chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.12.2018 Transmission Date NA