Ram Ishwar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2187 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8029 of 2016 ====================================================== Ram Ishwar Ram Son of Late Harigovind Ram, Resident of VillageFatehpur, P.S.- Didarganj, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Sri Arvind Kumar Chaudhary, The Principal Secretary, Home Department Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Sri Rajwinder Singh Bhatti, the Inspector General of Police, Prison and Reform Services Jail, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
Sri Brighu Srinivasan, The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Prison and Reform Services Jail, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.
Mohammad Akil, the Director, Probation Jail and Reform Services, Bihar, Patna.
6.
Sri Vinay Kumar Thakur, The Joint Secretary-Cum-Director, Administration prison and Reform Services Directorate, Home Department Government of Bihar, Patna.
7.
Sri Rajeev Jha, the Superintendent Sahid Khudiram Bose Central Jail, Muzaffarpur.
8.
Sri Ghanshyam Ram, The Superintendent, Sub-Divisional Jail Sitamarhi. 9.
Dr. Kumar Vijay Shankar, the Superintendent, Central Jail, Motihari. 10.
Sri Jitednera Kumar, The Superintendent, Central jail, Purnea. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Chaudhary, Sr.Advocate : Mr.Gajendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Additional Advocate General-3 : Ms.Divya Verma, A.C. to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2024 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Chaudhary, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms. Divya Verma, learned A.C. to AAG-3.
2. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner
Patna High Court MJC No.2187 of 2024(5) dt.29-11-2024 2/2 outrightly submits that in compliance of order dated 04.12.2023 passed in CWJC No.8029 of 2016, the Authority has passed a reasoned order dated 30.09.2024.
3. The petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the order dated 30.09.2024 before the appropriate Forum.
4. Accordingly, this MJC application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U