Kishore Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17054 of 2013 ====================================================== Kishore Kumar Mandal S/O Late Ganesh Chandra Mandal Resident Of Village- Madansahi, P.O- Mainanagar, P.S- Pranpur, District- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar and Ors
2. The Executive Director, State Health Society, Priwar Kalyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate- Cum- Chairman, District Health Society, Madhepura, District- Madhepura.
4. The Civil Surgeon- Cum- Chief Medical Officer- Cum- Member Secretary, Madhepura, District- Madhepur
5. The In Charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Alam Nagar, DistrictMadhepura.
6. The In Charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Chausa, DistrictMadhepura.
7. The In Charge Officer, Primary Health Centre, Puraini, District- Madhepura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nityanand Mishra, Adv.
Mr.Raj Bansh Dubey, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar, AC to PAAG2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 17-01-2019 This matter has been placed under the heading 'For Orders' (On Office Notes) at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in Paragraph 3 at Page 2 of the order, inadvertently it is recorded that "no rejoinder to the counter affidavit has been filed to controvert the statements made in the counter affidavit". Whereas, the fact is that a rejoinder to the counter affidavit is placed on the record. Learned counsel submits that he is simply
Patna High Court CWJC No.17054 of 2013(3) dt.17-01-2019 2/2 seeking recording of the fact as to filing of a rejoinder without looking for any modification in the order passed in the writ application.
Let the same be recorded and the same be read accordingly.
In place of the sentence occurring in Paragraph 4 at Page 3 of the order that "no rejoinder to the counter affidavit has been filed to controvert the statements made in the counter affidavit", it would be read as "a rejoinder has been filed to the counter affidavit to controvert the statements made in the counter affidavit".
The rest part of the order shall remain intact. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) R.R.Ojha/- U