Sarful Mian v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4194 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2019 Thana- BHANGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Sarful Mian Son Of Late Julum Mian Resident Of Village- Kotwa, P.SBhangaha, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Punam Kumari Singh, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the Union of India.
In the present case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Bhangaha P.S. Case no. 65 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under Sections 20, 22, 23, 24 and 27 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
Earlier, the petitioner had moved before this Court for grant of bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 20212 of 2020, which was rejected vide order dated 29.06.2020.
Allegation has been made that from the possession of co-accused including the petitioner, 4.5 K.G. of Ganja has been recovered, however, counsel for the petitioner submits that the said 4.5 K.G. of Ganja is much less quantity than the commercial quantity and he is in judicial custody since 26.12.2019 having no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4194 of 2021(4) dt.24-02-2021 2/2 Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bhangaha P.S. Case No. 65 of 2019 with a condition that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.
That apart, the petitioner would be required to appear before the Officer-in-charge of Bhangaha Police Station within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and in the first week of every month thereafter for the next nine months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Officer-in-charge of concerned Police Station and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. (Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T