Rajesh Kumar Verma And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
Patna High Court CWJC No.12665 of 2015 dt.31-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12665 of 2015 ===========================================================
1. Rajesh Kumar Verma Son of Late Ishwar Dayal, resident of Dayal Kutir, Gulbi Ghat, Basariya tola, Mahendra, Patna - 800006.
2. Sri Dilip Kumar Lal Das, Son of Late Maneshwar Lal Das, Resident of Village - P.O. - Simra, P.S. - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani.
3. Sri Awadhesh Tiwari, Sonof Jageshwar Tiwari, Resident of Village - Rampur Mani, P.O. - Suspa Mohammadpur, P.S. - Sakara, District - Muzaffarpur.
4. Sri Mritunjay Kumar, Son of Late Ramchandra Singh, resident of village + P.O. - Pain, P.S. - Shekhpura, District - Shekhpura.
5. Tribhuwan Shankar, Sonof Mahendra Sharma, resident of village + P.O. - Murlachak (Warsaliganj, P.S. - Warsaliganj, District - Nawada.
6. Md. Shafi Ahamad, Son of Late Md. Ram Jani Resident of Khutwa Chak, P.S. - Jehanabad (Town), District - Jehanabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Secretary, Rural Work Department, New Secretariat, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. Chief Engineer- 2, Rural Work Department, New Secretariat, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4. Superintending Engineer, Rural Work, Department Work Circle, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pratap Sharma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anirban Kundu, SC 24 Mr. Kumar Manglam, AC to SC24 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 31-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No. 10984 of 2017 (Buddhadeo Prasad Singh & ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue
Patna High Court CWJC No.12665 of 2015 dt.31-10-2018 involved in the present case.
In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is directed to examine the facts, law and prayer of the case of petitioners and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioners.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date1.11.2018 Transmission Date NA